Usc Viterbi Transfer College Confidential, Twin City Motor Speedway, Layne Ulrich Named After, Paano Mo Ilalarawan Ang Tagpuan Ng Epikong Bidasari, Articles OTHER

He can freely share with the faithful his reasons for preferring to adhere to the traditional practice and encourage the faithful to continue doing so. Devotion and reverence toward the Eucharist in the case of communion in the hand. So Indian Bishop conference have not got any Indult for communion in hand? Never receive Holy Communion by extending only one hand. A passage from St. Cyril of Jerusalem is used to persuade Catholics that Communion in the hand is an ancient practice legitimately restored after Vatican II. From these documents, we can deduce the following points. For you hear the words, the Body of Christ and respond Amen. Be then a member of the Body of Christ that your Amen may be true (St. Augustine, Sermon 272: PL 38, 1247). [3] Augustine, Answer to Petilian 2.23.53and Against Parmenian 2.7.13. It is standard procedure so I wonder what the basis of this accusation is. Hence any baptized Catholic who is not prevented by law must be admitted to Holy Communion. Your email address will not be published. The author claims that Communion in the hand could only be authorized in countries where it was an established practice but doesnt give a citation. The Holy Eucharist remits venial sins by disposing us to perform acts of love and contrition. June 29, 2021 | But one should not by his own judgment abstain from or return to communion, as he pleases. All our lives we who believe in Christ are moving in time toward that moment when we will be taken by death from this world and enter into the joy of the Lord in the eternal Kingdom he has prepared for us. [23] John Chrysostom, hom. We owe the Lord as much attention to detail. A priest who is not directly responsible for the care of souls should be even more respectful of local practice. I suspect that Christ can cope with particles that get dropped but the care we show, or the lack of care, is what counts. All rights reserved. This is the quote that is always used: " make your left hand a throne for the right, as for that which is to receive a King. Ive updated the post. 7. On reverence for the Eucharist and belief in the Real Presence among Catholic laity has greatly declined I dont think this has ever been proven. The missal of 1570 eliminated almost all sequences and moved the Prayers at the Foot of the Altar to the beginning of the Order of Mass though the Council of Trent never said a word about either. On the other hand, this mode of communion is not anywhere associated with lay involvement or accessibility, nor is it thought to de-emphasize the role of the priest. My sense is that if theres something demonic in all this it is the Galatians moment in which many Catholics find themselves, especially those on the traditional side. Todd, yes, the Church as a whole is growing thanks to the great efforts of missionaries in Africa and Asia (many are now coming back here), and yes, more people are receiving the Sacraments now than ever. Surveys from CARA and Pew reflect this, though I admittedly doubted them until I attended mass with a fellow Catholic at church that predominantly received on the tongue and my friend jeering remarked, why dont they receive in the hand like normal people? Eucharistic sharing in exceptional circumstances by other Christians requires permission according to the directives of the diocesan bishop and the provisions of canon law (canon 844 4). Answered by Legionary of Christ Father Edward McNamara, professor of liturgy and dean of theology at the Regina Apostolorum university. Most often when speaking of reverence, however, the Fathers emphasize two main things: 1) that every precaution should be taken lest the Eucharist fall to the ground and 2) that communicants should be from serious sin and quarrels with other Christians. What is the proper way of receiving Communion in the hand? Above all, it is necessary to have the introduction of the rite preceded by an effective catechesis so that the people will clearly understand the meaning of receiving in the hand and will practice it with the reverence owed to the sacrament. But back in the West, where most of us at PT are from, the Church is struggling. For tell me, if any one gave you grains of gold, would you not hold them with all carefulness, being on your guard against losing any of them, and suffering loss? Q. Finally, to the end that their coming to this heavenly table may be completely worthy and fruitful, the faithful should be instructed on its benefits and effects, for both the individual and society, so that their familial relationship to the Father who gives us our daily bread, may reflect the highest reverence for him, nurture love, and lead to a living bond with Christ, in whose flesh and blood we share.. Please remember that there is no "right" way to receive. He said that he had checked with the then Apostolic Delegation and had been assured that the pope was giving the boy a rosary. Several readers pointed out that I made no mention of a text of St. Cyril when mentioning the historical foundations of the practice. The traditional and preferred method is the reception of the Host on the tongue: Step forward and kneel at the Communion rail or station (if you stand, make a sign of reverencesuch as a bow or genuflection or Sign of the Crossbefore receiving the Host and take care not to disrupt the Communion line). The Netherlands, 18 September 1969 Who holds the wind in the palm of his hand? in Eph 3, trans. I dont read any statement with canonical force saying that only those countries may apply for an indult. The guidelines recommend against serving Communion until gatherings of more than 50 people are allowed. For the first few centuries of the Church, receiving Communion in the hand was a common practice. Not only was Communion in the hand started in disobedience, it was perpetuated by deceit. In the case of communion under both kinds by way of intinction, it is never permitted to place on the hand of the communicant the host that has been dipped in the Lords blood.. Pope Benedict XVI 1927-2022 tribute page and access to resources here. New Zealand, 24 April 1974 What is the proper way of receiving Communion in the hand? It must be presumed that a priest has sufficient formation in moral principles so as to exclude an erroneous conscience in such matters. Maybe this is due to its similarity to practices in most Protestant churches, many of which (Anglicans and Lutherans notwithstanding) fundamentally dont believe in a sacramental Communion substance. My three hypotheses were less well researched opinions on my part, theyre not (that last one was a joke on Cdl Sarahs comments, sorry if that wasnt clear), but simply launchpoints in an honest discussion on the impact of Pope Pauls Indult, and the circumstances surrounding it, whether or not they hold any real merit. Paraguay, 27 September 1971 It should be noted that it is never permissible for a person to dip the host he or she has received into the chalice. Rather maddeningly, it is the Anglicans who in the West have retained the practice as described by St. Cyril, while contemporary Latin-rite Catholics tend to consume the Host as if it were a potato chip., From the historical point of view, we can say that there is strong evidence that the practice existed in early centuries in some areas of the Church. My simple point is that the individual ways our Church evolves over history have a significant impact on its life thereafter, often in ways we dont expect. [17] See Eusebius, Ecclesiastical History, 7.9.4. Those who receive Communion may receive either in the hand or on the tongue, and the decision should be that of the individual receiving, not of the person distributing Communion. Australia, 26 September 1975 If Communion is given only under the species of bread, the Priest raises the host slightly and shows it to each, saying, The Body of Christ. For it is a deed fraught with destruction to take the tongue which serve such awesome mysteries, which has become purpled with a blood so precious, which has become a sword of gold and to change its course to abuse, insolence and ribald jests. The faithful must be taught that Jesus Christ is Lord and Savior and that therefore the worship of latria or adoration belonging to God is owed to Christ present in this sacrament. For this is what it is to receive unworthily: if one receives at that time when he ought to be doing penance. [16] Liturgical evidence from Rome is always sparser than one would like, but Eusebius preserves a mention of communion in the hand in a letter written from Dionysius of Alexandria to Sixtus I, bishop of Rome,[17] and in a letter of Cornelius, bishop of Rome. W.R., Goa, India. There are particles, and there are particles. Nowhere in this article did I see what the CHURCH says about Holy Communion, only the writers opinion. Guidelines for Receiving Holy Communion. In order to be properly disposed to . More people have received Communion in the past century. We would also do well to teach, as the Fathers do, that reverence is not only about proper reception of the Eucharist, but also about living the kind of life to which the Eucharist commits us. I am just wondering what the reason or reasons were for allowing reception of Communion in the hand to begin with? Fire and Spirit, contrary to nature LOS ANGELES, CA (Catholic Online) - Catholics want to know if it is allowed for their bishops and priests to require Communion be received only on in the hand instead of on the tongue. Jesus wants to use our hands, which have now become His hands, to help those in need. Finally, to the end that their coming to this heavenly table may be completely worthy and fruitful, the faithful should be instructed on its benefits and effects, for both the individual and society, so that their familial relationship to the Father who gives us our daily bread, may reflect the highest reverence for him, nurture love, and lead to a living bond with Christ, in whose flesh and blood we share. As with all historical practices, one must examine the context and circumstances which are usually not repeatable. SACRED CONGREGATION FOR DIVINE WORSHIP, Letter En reponse a la demande, to presidents of those conferences of bishops petitioning the indult for communion in the hand, 29 May 1969: Acta Apostolicae Sedis 61 (1969) 546-547; Notitiae 5 (1969) 351-353. In the light of the above, we can come to the heart of the matter as to whether a priest may invoke the question of conscience in order to refuse to distribute Communion in the hand. I wholeheartedly agree with your comment on another thread that this ongoing discussion is frivolous and is only causing needless division. 96). Many of us would treat your claims skeptically as unsupported rumor and gossip. Take this from someone who receives in the hand sometimes, I would never do it if I thought it was enabling Lucifer to corrupt my soul. I think that settles it. Since the question involves human attitudes, this mode of communion is bound up with the perceptiveness and preparation of the one receiving. That said, there are dimensions to this discussion that I think are both valuable and havent been given much screen time overall. From a hygienic point of view, the hand carries a huge amount of bacteria. A letter from the Congregation for Divine Worship to presidents of bishops conferences on May 29, 1969: AAS 61 (1969) 546-547; Notitiae 5 (1969) 351-353: In reply to the request of your conference of bishops regarding permission to give communion by placing the host on the hand of the faithful, I wish to communicate the following. I would like to remind people to indicate clearly how they wish to receive. Madagascar 2 March 1970 The condition is the complete avoidance of any cause for the faithful to be shocked and any danger of irreverence toward the Eucharist. As with all historical practices, one must examine the context and circumstances which are usually not repeatable.. Cyril of Jerusalem and Theodore of Mopsuestia liken the practice to that of receiving a king, and both of them note the method of reception was in joined hands (also described in other sources as hands in the form of a cross). Featured Image: Rossano Gospels, Last Supper, 6th c.; Source: Wikimedia Commons, PD-Old-100. Eccl., VII, ix). Required fields are marked *. Church Life Journal I do make the point that reverence, while important, is not the only or most important aspect of Communion. Bishops who have been permitted to introduce the new rite of communion are asked to send a report to the congregation, six months hence, on the outcome. On this point, I will leave you with a beautiful exhortation from the Golden Tongue: Think of what you receive in your hand and never lift it to strike another and never disgrace with the sin of assault the hand that has been honored with so great a gift. In this ordinance Christ ratifies his promises to his people, and they on their part solemnly consecrate themselves to him and to his entire service. Yugoslavia, 1971 But is the impression they give generally correct? Basil the Great considered Communion in the hand so irregular that he did not hesitate to consider it a grave fault. The life of Christ, the Holy Spirit, animates each of us individually, and all of us corporately and guides us together in our efforts to become one in Christ. The Church in Europe struggled mightilyand some might say in futilityagainst centuries of violence, sect on sect, nation vs nation. Luxembourg, October 15 1969 The option offered to the faithful of receiving the Eucharistic bread in their hand and putting it into their own mouth must not turn out to be the occasion for regarding it as ordinary bread or as just another religious article. Whatever procedure is adopted, care must be taken not to allow particles of the Eucharistic bread to fall or be scattered. Their attitude of reverence must measure up to what they are doing. It was designed: 1. II], Im not aware of that limitation and would like to see proper documentation. It also happens, on occasion, that the free choice of those who prefer to continue the practice of receiving the Eucharist on the tongue is not taken into account in those places where the distribution of Communion in the hand has been authorized.